High CourtsSingle Bench

Kailash Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 12 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 CHH CK 0141

HON’BLE JUDGES
ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 363, 366, 376 · Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 3, 4
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
M.Cr.C. No.1184 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 334 words
1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the Applicant who has been

arrested in connection with Crime No.46 of 2017 registered at Police Station Ranitarai, District Durg for offence punishable under Sections 363, 366,

376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act.

2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 27.3.2017, Sanjeev Kumar Sahu, father of the prosecutrix, aged about 15½ years, lodged a report

alleging that on 27.3.2017 itself at about 5:45 a.m., the present Applicant took away her daughter (the prosecutrix), against her will on his motorcycle.

Police registered aforestated Crime No.46 of 2017. During investigation, the prosecutrix was recovered from possession of the Applicant. He was

taken into custody on 27.3.2017 itself.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that the Applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in the case. He is in custody

since 27.3.2017. In her Court statement, the prosecutrix has not supported the case of the prosecution and has been declared hostile. He prays that

the Applicant may be released on bail.

4.

Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the bail application.

5.

I have heard Learned Counsel appearing for the parties and perused the entire case diary with due care.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly, the fact that the prosecutrix has not supported the case of the prosecution

and has been declared hostile and the Applicant is in custody since 27.3.2017, I am inclined to enlarge the Applicant on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

8.

It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one solvent surety of the like

sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.