High CourtsSingle Bench

Kajod vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 24 November 1988 · Citation: (1988) WLN 287

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinod Shanker Dave, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 2940 of 1988
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 142 words

Vinod Shanker Dave, J.—It appears from the order of the learned Sessions Judge, that the prosecutrix was the consenting party. Regarding the question of age, though that will be determined at the time of trial yet there is conflicting evidence and atleast it is certain that she has attained the age of discretion as is held by their Lordships of the Supreme Court in S. Varadarajan Vs. State of Madras, . In these circumstances, I am inclined to grant bail.

2.

The petitioner shall be released on bail provided he executes a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000/-(Rupees five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation to appear before that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial of this case.