High CourtsSingle Bench

Kakey Babu vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 11 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 UK CK 0032

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 411
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 293 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 186 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Kakey Babu is in judicial custody in FIR No.354 of 2021, under Sections 411, 34 IPC, Police Station Kashipur, District Udham Singh

Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing and perused the record.

3.

It is argued that nothing was recovered nothing was recovered from the applicant; recovery was made from the co-accused, it is he, who named

the present applicant and the applicant is not a previous convict.

4.

State counsel admits that there is no previous conviction recorded in the name of the applicant.

5 Having considered all these facts, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the court concerned.

8.

This bail order be forwarded to concerned court as well as the concerned jail through e-mail also.