High CourtsSingle Bench

Kala Devi Subba And Ors vs State Of Sikkim And Ors

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 6 April 2021 · Citation: (2021) 04 SIK CK 0010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 39 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 88 words

Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

In the present case, as directed earlier the amendment has to be made by the counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel contends that in place of moving of an application for amendment, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition joining all relevant pleadings.

Prayer seems to be reasonable, therefore, allowed.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.