High CourtsSingle Bench

Kala Singh @ Buta Singh vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 P&H CK 0026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Raj Mohan Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 325, 326, 427, 458
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 43080 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 486 words

Raj Mohan Singh, J

The case has been taken up for hearing through video-conferencing.

Petitioner seeks grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case bearing FIR No.0043 dated 07.07.2020 under Sections 307, 458, 324, 323, 427,

148, 149 IPC (Sections 325 and 326 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Bajakhana, District Faridkot.

As per allegations in the FIR, the occurrence took place in the intervening night of 05/06.07.2020 at about 12.00 AM when main gate of the house of

the complainant Jaswinder Kaur was knocked by Vicky Singh and Harpreet Singh @ Billa. They entered the house of the complainant by scaling over

the wall and then opened the main gate. Paramjit Kaur @ Pammi and her daughter Peetu Kaur entered the house. Kulbir Singh, Vicky Singh,

Harpreet Singh @ Billa, Gora Singh, Gurpreet Singh and the petitioner made entry in the house. Petitioner was shown to be armed with stick/rool. He

is alleged to have given rool/wooden blow on the right thigh of complainant, rool blow on the right leg of Lovepreet Singh and rool blow on the right

side neck of Arshdeep Singh.

Injury on the right leg of Lovepreet Singh was found to be grievous in nature i.e. punishable under Section 325 IPC. Total 11 persons have been

arrayed as accused in the FIR. The injury attributed to the petitioner on the person of complainant and Arshdeep Singh were found to be simple in

nature.

Challan has already been presented.

Factual position of the case has not been disputed by learned State counsel, however, he opposed the bail on the ground that the victims were inflicted

total 25 injuries and out of those injuries, 06 injuries were found to be grievous in nature. According to learned State counsel, the accused persons have

exhibited brutality and therefore, they are not entitled for any indulgence.

On consideration of material on prima facie note, it can be seen that none of the injuries on the person of complainant was found to be dangerous to

life.

The only injury attributed to the petitioner on the right leg of Lovepreet Singh was found to be grievous in nature.

Co-accused Pappa Singh has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 18.12.2020 passed in CRM-M No.41443 of 2020.

Co-accused namely Gurpreet Singh has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 15.12.2020 passed in CRM-M No.38015 of

2020.

Co-accused Paramjit Kaur @ Pammi and Jaspreet Kaur @ Peetu Kaur have been granted anticipatory bail.

Keeping in view the situation arising out of pandemic COVID-19 and without meaning anything on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed.

Petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail, subject to his furnishing adequate bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial

Court/concerned Duty Magistrate.

Nothing expressed hereinabove would be construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.