AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
9 paragraphs · 308 wordsAlok Kumar Verma, J
This Bail Application has been filed by the applicant-accused Kallu for grant of regular bail in connection with First Information Report No. 163 of 2023, registered at police station Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar under Section 8/21/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
As per FIR, 17.20 grams of smack, 27.20 grams of smack and 18.60 grams of smack were recovered from the possession of three co-accused on 13.05.2023. They were arrested at 21.15 hrs. The name of the present applicant has come in the confessional statements of the co-accused persons.
Heard Mr. Mani Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pramod Tiwari, learned Brief Holder for the State.
Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated by the co-accused persons; he was not on the spot; nothing was recovered from his possession; he is in custody since 02.06.2023; he is a permanent resident of District Udham Singh Nagar; two co-accused have been granted bail by this Court; and, the charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has opposed the bail application orally.
Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no reason to keep the applicant behind the bars for an indefinite period, therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage.
The Bail Application is allowed.
Let the applicant – Kallu be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
