High CourtsSingle Bench

Kalu vs State of Punjab and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 25 October 2013 · Citation: (2013) 10 P&H CK 0010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sabina, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 1880 of 2013
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 415 words

Sabina, J.—Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus and for appointment of a Warrant Officer to search the detenues, mentioned in para 3 of the petition, at the brick kiln of respondents No. 4 to 7 or any other place pointed out by the petitioner and to get them released from the illegal detention of respondents No. 4 to 7. It has been held by this Court in ''Murti versus The State of Punjab and others, LPA No. 32 of 2013'', as under:-

It may be mentioned here that the allegations of the appellant in the writ petition are that the alleged detenues mentioned in para No. 3 of the writ petition who are working as labourers at the brick kiln of respondent Nos. 4 & 5 are being kept as bonded labours. There can indeed be no doubt that if a labourer has been detained as bonded labour, it amounts to an offence under Sections 16 & 17 of the Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976. We, however, clarify that the aforesaid observation does not mean that the allegations levelled by the appellant have been accepted. Suffice it to observe that under the Act, the District Magistrate is under statutory obligation to hold a fact finding enquiry as and when a complaint alleging violation of the provisions of Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976 is received. Since the appellant in the instant case has specifically averred that the persons mentioned in para No. 3 of the writ petition have been detained as bonded labourers, we allow this appeal and set-aside/modify the order dated 9.1.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge to the extent that the petitioner''s writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate, Sangrur, to treat this writ petition as a complaint under the 1976 Act and take immediate action in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order alongwith a copy of the writ petition.

2.

Accordingly, this Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to District Magistrate, Ludhiana-respondent No. 2 to treat this petition as a complaint under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and take immediate action in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition.