High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Kalu Ram S/o Shri Birbal Ram vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 3 May 2017 · Citation: (2017) 05 RAJ CK 0010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta
CASE NUMBER
3817 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 226 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

2.

The instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has

been preferred on behalf of the petitioners who are in custody in

connection with F.I.R. No.3/2015, registered at Police Station

Sadulshahar, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences under

Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC.

3.

The petitioners are in judicial custody for magistrate triable

offences. The FIR was registered way back in the year 2015 and

custodial presence of the petitioners is not required for

investigation etc.

Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances available

on record but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners deserve to be

released on bail.

4.

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is directed that the petitioners (1) Kalu Ram,

(2)Hanuman and (3) Nahar Ram arrested in connection with the

F.I.R. No.3/2015, registered at Police Station Sadulshahar, District

Sri Ganganagar shall be released on bail provided each of them

furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with

the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing

and as and when called upon to do so.