High CourtsSingle Bench

Kamal vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 15 September 2021 · Citation: (2021) 09 P&H CK 0027

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anupinder Singh Grewal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 21, 61, 85 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 27127 Of 2021 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 317 words

Anupinder Singh Grewal, J

The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 164 dated 27.04.2021, under Sections 21/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ('NDPS Act' - for short), registered at Police Station City Mandi Dabwali, District Sirsa.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been arraigned as an accused on the statement of co-accused from whom 40 grams of heroin (non-commercial quantity) was allegedly recovered. He further contends that besides the statement of co- accused, there is no prima facie material which would connect the petitioner with the commission of the offence.

Learned State counsel has filed reply/status report by way of affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dabwali, District Sirsa wherein it is stated that the petitioner was involved in 03 other cases including 02 under the NDPS Act. He was acquitted in one case under the NDPS Act while the other cases are pending against the petitioner. In the reply besides the statement of the co-accused, there is no reference to any other material which would connect the petitioner with the commission of the offence.

This Court, by the order dated 09.08.2021, had directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer and join the investigation and in the event of his arrest, he was ordered to be released on ad-interim bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating/Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Ram Niwas, states that the petitioner has joined investigation.

In view of the above and the petitioner having joined investigation, the order dated 09.08.2021 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. He shall also join investigation as and when called upon to do so.

The petition stands disposed of.