High CourtsSingle Bench

Kamal Dev Sharma vs Sandeep Bhatnagar And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 28 October 2020 · Citation: (2020) 10 SHI CK 0208

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vivek Singh Thakur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
COPC-T No. 703 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 110 words

Vivek Singh Thakur, J

1.

Reply/compliance affidavit stands filed, however, the same is not on record.

2.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by the erstwhile H.P. State Administrative Tribunal stands complied with by the concerned authority.

3.

Though there is delay in compliance, however, learned counsel for the respondents submits that he has instructions to tender unconditional and unqualified apology for the same.

4.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and accepting the apology tendered by the respondents, the present petition is closed and disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate petition, if anything still survives to be redressed.