High CourtsSingle Bench

Kamal Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 December 2025 · Citation: (2025) 12 P&H CK 1897

HON’BLE JUDGES
Namit Kumar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 35251 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 158 words

Namit Kuumar, J

1.

By way of present writ petitionn, petitioner is seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant her family pension andd other pensionary benefits siince the date of death of her husband i.e. 16.01.2005. She has also prayed for interest on the delayed payment.

2.

Learned State counsel, who appears on receipt of advance copy of thee petition, on instructions from Lal Singh, concerned Branch Assistant annd in terms of order dated 28.11.2025 passed by this Court, submits thatt all the retiral dues of the petitiooner have already been released, including the family pension, and the said fact has been concealed by the petitioner.

3.

Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action for claiming interest on the delayed payment of retiral dues.

4.

Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.