AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 220 wordsThe present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 0189/2020 Registered at Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 376(2)(I), 376-D of IPC and Section 5G, 6 of POCSO Act and Section 67-B of Information and Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000 (in F.I.R.) & under Sections 376(3), 376(2)(I), 376-D of IPC and Section 5G/6 of POCSO Act and Section 67-B of Information and Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000 (in Order).
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that prosecutrix (PW-3) and her mother and father have not supported the case of prosecution during trial and all of them have been declared hostile by the learned trial court.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
Considering the material on record and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the statements of prosecutrix (PW-3) and her mother and father and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioners be admitted to regular bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
