High CourtsSingle Bench

Kamala Tamang & Ors vs State Of Sikkim & Ors

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 23 November 2022 · Citation: (2022) 11 SIK CK 0057

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 35 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 106 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

Mr. A. Moulik, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a rejoinder to the counter affidavit filed by the respondent nos. 28 and 36. The same is taken on record.

I.A. No. 03 of 2022

The learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 submits that they have not filed their reply to this application as yet. He seeks three weeks time, which is granted.

I.A. No. 05 of 2022

The learned counsel for the respondents seeks three weeks time to file their reply to this application. Granted.

List the matter on 23.02.2023.