AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 157 wordsVipin Sanghi, CJ
In compiance of the previous order dated 03.03.2023, the statement of petitioner no.1 has been recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the same has been sent to the Court in a sealed cover, which has been opened. She has not supported her complaint case, on the basis of which, FIR was registered against petitioner no.2.
In the light of the aforesaid, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent-State to make an assessment of the threat perceived by the petitioners from respondent nos. 4 and 5 and to provide adequate protection to the petitioners, as is considered necessary for their safety.
Respondent no.3 shall summon respondent nos. 4 and 5 to the police station and counsel them not to take law into their own hands.
Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.