High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 02 PAT CK 0037

Kamlesh Kumar Singh And Ors vs State Of Bihar Through Secretary And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 4 February 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashutosh Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 23287 Of 2019, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14609 Of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 404 words

Counter affidavit in C.W.J.C. No. 14609 of 2017 has been filed during the course of the day.

Let it be taken on record.

C.W.J.C. No. 23287 of 2019 (Kamlesh Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar) and C.W.J.C. No. 14609 of 2017 (Reyaz Ahmad v. State of Bihar) have been

taken up together. For sheer necessity, C.W.J.C. No. 14609 of 2017 is being disposed of first as the relief prayed for in C.W.J.C. No. 23287 of 2019

is dependent upon any decision passed in the Writ Petition No. 14609 of 2017.

Reyaz Ahmad (C.W.J.C. No. 14609 of 2017)

The petitioner had challenged the advertisement inviting persons for being considered for selection as licensees under the Public Distribution System

on the sole ground that the vacancies were calculated without observing the roster for reservation.

The counter affidavit which has been filed today in Court indicates that the roster of reservation was provided by the government which in turn was

provided to the relevant department for issuance of advertisement for the vacancy in the number of licensees for particular areas.

There is no reason to dispute the aforesaid factual statement by the state and therefore, the writ petition is not required to be adjudicated any further.

The petition is dismissed in the light of the averments made in the counter affidavit which has not been challenged by the learned counsel for the

petitioner.

Kamlesh Kumar Singh (C.W.J.C. No. 23287 of 2019)

The petitioners’ claim that they have been selected for being issued licenses but no license has been issued to them only for the reason that in the

earlier case Reyaz Ahmad (C.W.J.C. No. 14609 of 2017), an order was passed by a bench of this Court to continue with the process of selection but

till the disposal of the aforesaid writ petition, no license be granted to any person.

With the dismissal of the aforesaid writ petition, no such embargo now remains in force and if the petitioners are the selected candidates, they ought to

be given the license as early as possible. Any delay in the matter would only disrupt the supply of essential commodities to the targeted population.

The petitioners are therefore directed to make available a copy of this order to the concerned respondent who shall take steps for grant of license to

the petitioners after ensuring that they have been properly selected.

With the aforesaid direction/observation, the writ petition is disposed of.