AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
29 paragraphs · 310 wordsThe appellants have preferred this criminal appeal against the judgment
of conviction and order of sentence dated 05.06.2017 passed in S.T. Case No.
79 of 2006 by Sri Syed Saleem Fatmi, learned Additional Sessions Judge-XII,
Dhanbad whereby and whereunder the appellants have been convicted under
sections 147, 148, 323, 341, 324, 325, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and they
were sentenced to undergo R.I for one year under section 147, and 323 of the
Indian Penal Code and to undergo R.I for two years under section 148 and R.I
for one month under section 341 I.P.C, R.I for three years under section 324 I.P.C
and further undergo R.I for three years under section 325 I.P.C and a fine of Rs.
1,000/- each convict. The fine amount of total Rs. 8,000/- realized from all
convicts shall be payable to informant so as to make him good of expenses
incurred in their treatment and all the sentences were directed to run
concurrently.
From perusal report of stamp reporter, it appears that appeal has been
filed within time and it is in order.
Appeal will be heard.
Admit.
Call for L.C.R.
An I.A. No. 5016 of 2017 has been field for confirmation of bail granted
to the appellants by the court below.
Accordingly, provisional bail granted to the appellants by the trial court
vide order dated 05.06.2017 is hereby confirmed subject to the conditions that
the appellants will deposit Rs. 1,000/- each as fine amount before the trial court
latest by 04.07.2017. Thereafter, trial court will issue notice to the informant
and after appearance of the informant, the aforesaid amount will be released in
favour of informant.
I.A. No. I.A. No. 5016 of 2017 stands allowed and disposed of.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned today at
once through FAX.
