AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
10 paragraphs · 244 wordsAlok Singh, J.—This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 43 dated 9.3.2011 under Sections 406/498-A IPC, Police Station Shimlapuri, Ludhiana.
This Court vide order dated 6.4.2011 has directed to release the Petitioners on interim bail.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that Petitioners have already been released on bail and the Petitioners have joined the investigation and shall join the investigation as and when asked to do so by the Investigating Officer.
Mr. Gulzar Mohd., learned Counsel for the complainant, has vehemently opposed the bail application.
Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab, on instructions from ASI Baljit Singh, who is personally present in Court, states that Petitioners are co-operating in the investigation.
Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 6.4.2011 is made absolute, subject to the following conditions:
i) that they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
ii) that they shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
iii) that they shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.
It is made clear that in the event of violation of any of the conditions, prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of the bail.
