Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2022) 12 TDSAT CK 0008

Kamyab Television Pvt Ltd vs Union Of India And Anr

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 8 December 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Krishna Gautam, Member
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition No. 33 Of 2019

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 179 words

BP  No. 33 of 2019

Learned counsel for both sides are present. Learned counsel for Petitioner showed his inability to argue because of having no instruction from his client. One additional date is being requested with an assurance that the Counsel will certainly argue on that day.

List the matter ‘for hearing’ on 20.2.2023

Let written arguments, if any, after exchange in between, by both sides, be got filed within four weeks.

BP No. 368 of 2017

Learned counsel for Petitioner mentioned that EA No. 1/2020 shown in cause list has wrongly been shown because the same is pending before Court No. 1 of this Tribunal and it cannot be listed before this Court.

Office is being directed to be careful for correct mentioning and listing. Counsel for Respondent showed his inability to argue and requested for a date for argument along with Petition no. 33 of 2019. The same is not being opposed.

List the matter ‘for hearing’ on 20.2.2023

Let written arguments, if any, after exchange in between, by both sides, be got filed within four weeks.