High CourtsSingle Bench

Kapil Tomar vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 17 October 2023 · Citation: (2023) 10 MP CK 0069

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunita Yadav, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2), 47(A)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 46754 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 537 words

Sunita Yadav, J

This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail relating to FIR No.1076 of 2023 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Morena (M.P.) for the offence under Sections 34 (2) and 47 (A) of Excise Act.

Allegations against the applicant/accused, in short, are that the police apprehended the applicant along with co-accused and recovered from their joint possession 189 liters country made liqour, for which, the applicant was not having any valid license.

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. It is further argued that the applicant is in custody since 16.9.2023. Offence is triable by JMFC and trial is likely to take long time to conclude. It is further submitted that co-accused Shailendra @ Shailu has already been granted bail by this Court on 09.10.2023 passed in M.Cr.C. No.44469 of 2023. Applicant is the permanent resident of District Morena (M.P.) and there is no possibility of his absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence. Applicant is ready to abide by all the terms and conditions which may be imposed by this Court while granting bail. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the bail application on the ground of criminal antecedents of the applicant and prays for dismissal of present bail application.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the case diary available on record.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 (Rupees One Lac Only) with two solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-

1) The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2) The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3 ) The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused;

5) The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6 ) The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

(7) The applicant shall mark his attendance before the SHO of the concerning police station in the first week of every month till conclusion of trial.

Learned State counsel is directed to send an e-copy of this order to the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station for information and necessary action.

E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance, if possible, by the office of this Court.

Certified copy as per rules.