High CourtsSingle Bench

Karamjit Kaur vs Paramjit Singh

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 March 1987 · Citation: (1987) 03 P&H CK 0006

HON’BLE JUDGES
S P. Goyal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 24
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Revision No 3393 of 1986
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 233 words

S.P. Goyal, J.—In the matrimonial cause, the Petitioner moved an application u/s 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act for grant of ad interim maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1,000/- per month and Rs. 1,100/- as litigation expenses alleging that the Respondent, who was a tailor master, was earning Rs. 2,500/- per month. The Respondent, in the reply, stated that he was only earning Rs. 300/- to Rs. 350/- per month by working on a shop as a tailor master.

2.

The trial Court, without recording any finding as to the income of the Respondent, allowed Rs. 75/- per month as pendente lite maintenance and Rs. 150/- as litigation expenses. The order on the face of it is absurd. Even as unskilled labourer earns more than Rs 20/- per day. A tailor master is not expected to earn less then Rs. 1,000/- per month. In any case, the wife, who has also to support a child, has to be given maintenance allowance which can sustain them reasonably. The amount of Rs. 150/- allowed as litigation expenses it also too meagre. The impugned order is, therefore, revised and the wife allowed Rs. 300/- per month as maintenance pendente lite, Rs. 100/- for the child and Rs. 200/- for her, and Rs. 800/- as litigation expenses. The maintenance shall be payable from the date of the application in the trial Court at the above rate.