High CourtsSingle Bench

Karan Jatav vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 26 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 MP CK 0191

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunita Yadav, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 20
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 16927 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 494 words

Sunita Yadav, J

This is first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail relating to Crime No.179/2024 registered at Police Station Pichhore, District Shivpuri (M.P.) for the offence under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated. Further submission is that the applicant neither consumed nor cultivated any psychotropic substance such as Ganja i.e. 2 kg 560 gram. The police had seized the alleged contraband from the government land adjoining a temple situated nearby and the present applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further argued that applicant is in custody since 06.04.2024. Seized quantity does not come within the purview of commercial quantity. Further argument is that the applicant is permanent resident of District Shivpuri (M.P.). Conclusion of trial is likely to take time and there is no likelihood of his absconsion, if released on bail. On these grounds, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor for respondent/State vehemently opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the case diary available on record.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two local solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/committal Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-

1) The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him/her;

2) The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3 ) The applicant will not indulge himself/herself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4) The applicant will not commit any other offence or will not repeat the offence in future. In case, if he/she is found involving in the offence of same nature, this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically without further reference to the Bench.

5) The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and 6 ) The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

Learned State counsel is directed to send an e-copy of this order to the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station for information and necessary action.

E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance, if possible, by the office of this Court.

Certified copy as per rules.