AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 360 wordsRavindra Maithani, J
The challenge in this petition is made to the FIR No. 0728 of 2021, under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry
Prohibition Act, 1961 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar.
Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset would submit that there are immense chances of settlement between the parties. Petitioner and
petitioner no. 3 had love marriage, they have also sought protection from the Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the case is fully covered by the judgment in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and
another (2014) 8 SCC 273.
It is argued that the petition may be disposed of with the direction to Investigating Officer that he shall follow the directions of Hon’ble Supreme
Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra) during the course of the investigation of the case.
In the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra), the Hon’ble Supreme Court issued various direction with regard to arrest and remand of an accused.
Specific mention is made to the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC in the judgment. Particularly, para 11.1 of the judgment in the case of
Arnesh Kumar (supra) provides as hereunder:-
“11.1. All the State Governments to instruct its police officers not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498-A IPC is registered but
to satisfy themselves about the necessity for arrest under the parameters laid down above flowing from Section 41 CrPCâ€
Even otherwise also, arrest is not a routine and mechanical act of the IO. The IO is first to satisfy that some offence is being committed and
thereafter, to satisfy that arrest is required, for further investigation of the matter. In the cases like instant one, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has
categorically laid down directions in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra).
This Court has no doubt that the IO shall follow the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court while investigating the instant case.
With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.
