High CourtsSingle Bench

Karan Kashyap vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 23 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 UK CK 0145

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 366, 370A, 376D, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1865 of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 140 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Karan Kashyap is in judicial custody in FIR No.222 of 2022, under Sections 366, 376D, 370A, 506, 120B IPC, Police Station SIDCUL, District- Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the victim herself has not supported the prosecution case at trial.

4.

This fact is not disputed by learned State Counsel.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.