High CourtsSingle Bench

Karan Nischal vs Smt. Poonam Nischal

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 23 May 2014 · Citation: (2014) 05 P&H CK 0346

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jaswant Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CR 2639/2014
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 203 words

Jaswant Singh, J.—Petitioner husband is in revision under Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order dated 6.2.2014 (P-3) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Amritsar wherein respondent wife in a petition for dissolution of marriage filed by the petitioner husband, has been granted maintenance pendente lite @ Rs. 10,000/- besides litigation expenses of Rs. 15,000/-.

2.

Heard learned counsel and perused the impugned order.

3.

It is not disputed that the respondent is legally wedded wife of the petitioner and he is legally and morally bound to maintain her. It is also not disputed that respondent wife had alleged that petitioner was running two Gun houses. Though, petitioner denied being owner of aforesaid two Gun houses, but in his reply he did not disclose as to who owned those two Gun houses or what is his profession/income. In these circumstances, the learned Additional District Judge, has rightly relied upon the version given by the respondent wife. As regard the grant of maintenance pendente lite, the same cannot be said to be on higher side keeping in view the cost of living these days.

4.

In view of the above, finding no merit in this revision petition the same is hereby dismissed.