AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
36 paragraphs · 395 wordsThe instant petition has been filed under Section 438 of
Cr.P.C., for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.307 dated
11.06.2016, under Sections 363, 366-A, 376-D, 120-B of the Indian Penal
Code and Section 6 of POCSO Act (offences under Sections 376-D, 120-B
of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act added later on) registered at Police
Station Hodal, District Palwal.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that during
investigation conducted by the DSP, Hodal, the petitioner herein was found to be innocent and kept in column No.2. It is subsequently that an
application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. was filed and the petitioner herein
has been summoned along with two others to face the trial as accused. It is
also contended that nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner and he is
ready to join the proceedings before the trial court.
Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondent-State as well as counsel for the complainant, oppose the grant of
anticipatory bail, while submitting that offences alleged against the
petitioner are serious in nature.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
In the instant case trial has already been commenced and it is
after recording the statements of the complainant and prosecutrix as PW9
and PW11 respectively that an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. was
filed, which came to be allowed on 29.08.2017. Resultantly, the petitioner
herein along with two other persons have been summoned to stand for the
trial along with accused Mahender.
In view of the facts that the petitioner herein is not required for
the custodial interrogation and that he is ready to join the proceedings
before the trial court, no useful purpose would be served by sending the
petitioner behind bars. At this stage, without commenting on the merits of
the case, the instant petition is being allowed and the petitioner herein is
directed to surrender/appear before the trial court within a period of 10 days
from today and on his doing so, he be released on bail by the trial court to
its satisfaction. Needless to say in case, the petitioner herein fails to
comply with the direction being issued by this court, the instant petition
shall be deemed to be dismissed.
The petition in hand stands allowed, with the aforesaid
directions.
