High CourtsSingle Bench

Karn Singh vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 12 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 P&H CK 0151

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotroic Substantes Act, 1985 — Section 22 · Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 439
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 19503 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 442 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J

This is a petition under Article 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 186 dated 28.09.2018,

registered under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 at police Station Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh

Sahib, Punjab.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has reilied upon the order dated 14.12.2020 passed in CRM-M-11135-2019 and submits that the petitioner is also in

custody for more than 2 years 2 months and 12 days and the trial is not proceeding due to Covid-19 situation. The operative part of the order reads as

under:-

“Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in judicial custody for the period of last 02 years, 02 months and 13 days and out of

total 11 prosecution witnesses, only 03 witnesses have been examined so far, hence, on account of this reason as well as due to Covid-19 situation, the

trial is likely to take a long time in its conclusion.

Learned State counsel, on the basis of the custody certificate filed today in Court, has not disputed the factual position, however, submitted that

recovery is of commercial quantity.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

Without commenting on the merits of the case, considering the fact that petitioner is in judicial custody for the last about 02 years, 02 months and 13

days and due to Covid-19 situation, the conclusion of trial is likely to take some time, the present petition is disposed of and the petitioner is ordered to

be released on interim bail till 25.05.2021, on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Illaqa Magistrate,

concerned.

However, the trial Court, after assessing the situation, if the trial has not started in ordinary course and the evidence is recorded, may cancel or may

continue the interim bail granted to the petitioner till further orders.â€​

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without commenting on the merits of the case, considering the fact that petitioner is in judicial custody

for the last about 02 years, 02 months and 12 days and due to Covid-19 situation, the conclusion of trial is likely to take some time, the present petition

is disposed of and the petitioner is ordered to be released on interim bail till 25.05.2021, on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial

Court/Duty Magistrate/Illaqa Magistrate, concerned.

However, the trial Court, after assessing the situation, if the trial has not started in ordinary course and the evidence is recorded, may cancel or may

continue the interim bail granted to the petitioner till further orders.