AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
71 paragraphs · 790 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioners and the
State.
The writ petition has been filed seeking the
following reliefs:
"(i) For setting aside the letter contained in Memo No. 1011 dated 27.04.2017 issued by Respondent No. 2 whereby representation filed by the petitioner has been rejected without considering all relevant materials including the report dated 19.04.2017 in derogation of the order dated 26.04.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6309 of 2017.
(ii) For directing the respondents to include the name of the petitioners in the voter list of Ward No. 17 made for Barh Nagar Parishad forthwith.
(iii) For directing the respondents to stay the insuing election of Ward No. 17, Nagar Palika Election 2017 till name of petitioners be included in the voter list of Ward No. 17, Barh Nagar Parishad.
(iv) For grant of any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner be found entitled in the eye of law."
The petitioners had filed an application for addition
of their name in the voter list of Ward No. 17 of Barh Nagar
Parishad and when the same was not considered, they moved the
Court in C.W.J.C. No. 6309 of 2017, which was disposed off by
order dated 26.04.2017, directing the respondent no. 2 to take a
final decision and pass appropriate orders, including the report
submitted by the Block Welfare Officer dated 19.04.2017.
Pursuant to the same, the petitioners submitted representation to the
respondent no. 2 on which an order was passed on 27.04.2017, by
which such request has been refused. The same is impugned in the
present writ application.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that
the ground taken by the respondent no. 2, to reject the prayer for
including their name in Ward No. 17 of Barh Nagar Parishad is
erroneous as the same has been done for the reason that the name
of the petitioners is in the voter list for the Assembly Constituency
No. 179 pertaining to Barh, which is not correct inasmuch as, their
names have been deleted from such voter list. In support of such
contention, learned counsel has drawn the attention of the Court to
annexure P/7 to contend that the list down loaded from the website
neither contains the serial numbers of the petitioners nor their
names. Learned counsel submitted that once the names of the
petitioners stand deleted from the Assembly Constituency voter
list, coupled with the fact that there is a recommendation in favour
of the petitioners by the Block Welfare Officer in his report dated
19.04.2017, their name was required to be included in Ward No. 17
of Barh Nagar Parishad.
Learned counsel for the State submitted that the
ground taken in the order impugned is factually correct. It was
submitted that an attempt was made yesterday to access the site
from where the petitioners had downloaded the documents, copy of
which has been made Annexure-P/7, but the same being
inaccessible, a report has been obtained from the Election
Registration Authority for 179- Bihar Vidhan Sabha Constituency-
cum-Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Barh, who has given a
certificate under Memo No. 450 dated 02.05.2017 to the effect that
the name of the petitioner no. 1 is at serial no. 790 whereas that of
petitioner no. 2 is at serial no. 801, copy of the same has been
produced before the Court and is being kept on record.
The only issue involved before the Court is as to
whether, as a matter of fact, the names of the petitioners are present
in the 179- Bihar Vidhan Sabha Constituency voter list or not. A
certificate being produced before this Court from the Competent
Authority, who is the Registration Officer for 179- Bihar Vidhan
Sabha Constituency, to the effect that the name of the petitioners is
at serial nos. 790 and 801, cannot be brushed aside, at least by the
Court in the present judicial proceeding, as there is presumption in
law to the correctness of official records. Thus, the information
which the petitioners may have downloaded from the web cannot
negate the certificate brought before the Court and issued by the
Election Registration Officer for 179- Bihar Vidhan Sabha
Constituency.
Unless the names of the petitioners are deleted
from the voter list for the Assembly Constituency, which makes
them residents outside the geographical limit of Barh Nagar
Parishad, there cannot be any fresh entry of their names in any of
the Wards of Barh Nagar Parishad.
In view of the aforesaid, the Court does not find
any ground to interfere in the matter. Accordingly, the writ
petition stands dismissed.
However, the writ petitioners would not be
precluded to take appropriate steps, in accordance with law, before
the appropriate authority/forum, at the appropriate stage.
