AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
45 paragraphs · 365 wordsCRM-30840-2017
This is application for exemption from filing certified
copies of Annexures P-3 to P-7 as well as placing on record the
photostat copies of the same.
The application is allowed and Annexures P-3 to P-7
are taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
CRM-30841-2017
This is application for placing on record Affidavit of the
petitioner dated 13.09.2017.
Application is allowed and affidavit of the petitioner
dated 13.09.2017 is taken on record.
CRM No. M-21845-2017
The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 81
dated 13.05.2017 under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471,
120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Lopoke, District Amritsar
(Rural).
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the
allegations against the petitioner are that in the year 1992, he
had identified Lakha Singh as guarantor for Gurnam Singh who
had obtained loan for purchase of a truck from Punjab Financial
Corporation. He further contends that the entire amount, which
was due to the Punjab Financial Corporation, has been paid by the
petitioner and his brother-Manjit Singh.
Learned counsel for the complainant contends that an
amount of `1,10,000/- remains to be paid by the petitioner to the
complainant, as the complainant had himself paid that amount to
Punjab Financial Corporation to save the land from auction.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that if
any amount has to be paid by the petitioner, he will pay the
same.
This Court vide order dated 06.07.2017, had directed
the petitioner to join investigation and in the event of his arrest,
he was to be released on ad-interim bail to the satisfaction of
Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions
envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Learned State counsel, upon instructions from HC
Major Singh states that in pursuance to the order dated
06.07.2017 the petitioner has joined investigation and is not
required for custodial interrogation.
In view of the above and without expressing any
opinion on the merits of case, the order dated 06.07.2017,
granting ad-interim bail to the petitioner, is hereby made
absolute. However, the petitioner shall abide by the conditions
envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
