High CourtsSingle Bench

Kaustav Bhowmik vs State Of Tripura & Ors

Tripura High Court · Decided on 12 May 2026 · Citation: (2026) 05 TP CK 1238

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Datta Purkayastha, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Interlocutory Application No. 1 Of 2026 In Writ Petition (C) No. 273 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 96 words

S. Datta Purkayastha, J

Heard learned counsel of both sides.

Mr. Samar Das, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, submits that the applicant's mother is required to be added as a respondent in this case, as the applicant is claiming family pension upon the death of his father and during the lifetime of his father, the mother was judicially separated from him.

Considered.

Prayer is allowed.

Registry is to incorporate the name and address of the newly added party in the cause title of the writ petition as respondent No.6.

Interlocutory application is, accordingly, disposed of.