AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
3 paragraphs · 187 wordsA. Ramamurthi, J.—Heard the petitioner.
The Petitioner/wife has filed this petition to transfer H.M.O.P. No.48 of 2001 pending on the file of Sub Court, Karur to the Sub Court, Palani on the ground that she is residing at Palani and she is not able to come to Karur which is at a distance of 130 K.M. For every hearing. It appears that H.M.O.P.No.48 of 2001 has been filed by the husband for divorce. Simply because the wife is residing at a distance of 130 , K.M. it is not a ground to transfer the case. It is open to the petitioner to appear before the Court on the date when she has to be examined and her presence on every dates is not necessary. I am of the view that there is no valid reason to transfer the case.
Hence, the transfer petition is dismissed. However, a direction is given to the Sub Court, Karur to dispose of the H.M.O.P.48 of 2001 as early as possible not exceeding six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently,C.M.P.No.684 of 2002 is closed.