High CourtsSingle Bench

Kayyum vs State of Uttarakhand & others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 4 January 2018 · Citation: (2018) 01 UK CK 0034

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=1767>Indian Penal Code, 1860</a>, <a href=1767-420>Section 420</a> - Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
09 of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 141 words
1.

Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, present for the petitioner.

2.

Mr. Sudhir Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General, present for the State/respondent Nos.1 & 2.

3.

Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate, present for the respondent No.3.

4.

The First Information Report has been lodged by respondent No.3, which has been registered as Case Crime No.370 of 2017 under Section

420 of IPC, at Police Station Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar, implicating the present petitioner. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has

approached this Court for relief.

5.

This Court has been informed that the petitioner is absconding and he is not cooperating in the investigation.

6.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that petitioner is not cooperating in the investigation, no interference is

being called for by this Court in the matter.

7.

Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed.