High Courts

Kewal Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 10 September 2004 · Citation: (2004) 3 CCJ 256

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mehtab S.Gill, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 18138-M of 2004
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 100 words

Mehtab S. Gill, J.

1.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was not apprehended on the spot. The First Information Report registered against him, was a false one and the contraband has been implanted on him by the Investigating Agency. Petitioner is in custody since 1 year and 9 months.

2.

Learned counsel for the State has stated that out of 14 witnesses cited by the prosecution, only one has been examined till date.

3.

Without commenting on the merits of the case, bail is granted to the petitioner to the satisfaction of the trial Court.