High CourtsSingle Bench

Kewal Singh vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 P&H CK 0124

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code 1860 — Section 120B, 302
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM No. M-13308 of 2018 (O&M)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 308 words

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.(ORAL)

Petitioner seeks regular bail pending trial in case FIR No.15 dated 26.01.2017, under Sections 302/120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Nahianwala,

District Bathinda.

Counsel for the parties have been heard.

FIR came to be registered on the statement of Baljeet Singh in relation to an alleged occurrence dated 25.01.2017. Deceased is Lakhvir Singh i.e. son

of the complainant.

As per initial version of the complainant, Lakhvir Singh was done to death by Balwinder Singh @ Bittu who was armed with a kirch and Gurtej Singh

@ Mintu armed with an axe. Motive attributed is that 7/8 years prior to the occurrence Lakhvir Singh (since deceased) had inflicted injuries upon

Balwinder Singh and in which Lakhvir Singh was convicted and was now on bail.

Present petitioner has been implicated on the basis of a supplementary statement recorded of the complainant on 29.01.2017 and as per which the

present petitioner along with other certain other co-accused had consumed liquor together and had kept a watch on the whereabouts of deceased

Lakhvir Singh.

It has gone uncontroverted that even as per supplementary statement recorded of Baljeet Singh, no overt act/injury has been attributed to the present

petitioner on the person of the deceased.

Petitioner was arrested on 30.01.2017.

Investigation having been completed, challan was presented and even charges have been framed. Examination-in-chief of the complainant, namely,

Baljeet Singh (father of the deceased) already stands recorded.

Trial would take time to conclude.

Co-accused Gurdeep Singh and whose name also figured in the supplementary statement recorded of Baljeet Singh complainant has been granted

concession of bail vide order dated 21.02.2018 in CRM No.M-5809 of 2018.

Without making any observations on merits, petitioner is held entitled to the benefit of bail.

Petition is allowed. Petitioner be enlarged on bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.

Disposed of.