High CourtsSingle Bench

Khadak Ram & Others vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 July 2021 · Citation: (2021) 07 UK CK 0150

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 21
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 173 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

32 paragraphs · 585 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

2.

Intervention application (CLMA No. 2117 of 2020) is allowed.

3.

Petitioners are residents of Village Mundoli Kankhura, District Chamoli. They had earlier filed WPMS No. 74 of 2018, which was disposed of by

this Court vide order dated 11.01.2018. By the said order, petitioners were permitted to make fresh representation to District Magistrate, Chamoli and

the District Magistrate was directed to take decision on the said representation within four weeks. It was further provided that, till decision on

petitioners’ representation, status quo, as regards construction of road, shall be maintained.

4.

According to the petitioners, they made representation pursuant to the said order, however, no decision thereupon was taken by District Magistrate.

Since in the meantime, the concerned authorities had taken steps for cutting the trees, therefore, petitioners had approached this Court, seeking the

following reliefs:

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the list issued by the respondent No. 12 dated December, 2019, for cutting

of trees for which the last date 15.04.2020 (Annexure No. 13 to the writ petition), the N.O.C. given by the respondent No. 9 dated 16.05.2011

(Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition) and copy of the survey report dated 12.11.2014 issued by the respondent No. 11 (Annexure No. 8 to the writ

petition) and copy of the permission dated 26.10.2017 given by respondent No. 10 (Annexure No. 11 to the writ petition).

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus restraining the respondent No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 10 & 12 to not construct the Kodba band to

Devsthali road, for which Court has already directed to maintain the status quo dated 11.01.2018 (Annexure No. 4 to the writ petition), without

surveying and shifting the total villagers to other safe place before cutting of the trees and hills, for which the road is proposed.

(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to maintain the status quo as on today and not disturb the

peaceful life of villagers (citizens) by the act the respondents are violating the fundamental rights of the petitioners, which is protected under Article 21

of the Constitution of India.â€​

5.

Learned Additional C.S.C. submits that construction of road has not begun.

6.

Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the interveners submits that, in view of the demand raised by the villagers at various

forums, the project for construction of road Kodba Band to Devsthali Road was approved and necessary funds were allocated, however, due to

opposition by few villagers, the construction work is stalled.

7.

This Court, vide order dated 24.06.2021, had granted time to learned State Counsel to get instructions regarding the representation submitted by the

petitioners and decision, if any, taken by District Magistrate thereupon. Thereafter, two more opportunities were granted to the State Counsel for the

purpose. Today, learned Additional C.S.C. submits that District Magistrate has decided the representation submitted by the petitioners vide order

dated 14.07.2021. He further submits that District Magistrate has dealt with all the issues, including the issue raised by the petitioners in their

representation.

8.

In view of this development, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh

petition, challenging the order passed by District Magistrate on 14.07.2021.

9.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.