High CourtsSingle Bench

Khais vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 23 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 KL CK 0220

HON’BLE JUDGES
Viju Abraham, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)(ii)C
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 7245 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 461 words

Viju Abraham, J.

1.

This is an application for regular bail.

2.

Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No. 11 of 2021 of Excise Range Office, Tirur, registered alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)C of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

3.

The prosecution case is that, based on the information received, the Excise Circle Inspector, Tirur conducted a search in the 2nd room at the 1st floor of the building belonging to one Rafeeq, Mudikkal house, Alungal desom and seized 40.5 kgs of ganja.

4.

Petitioner submits that he was arrested on 07.05.2022 and that he was made an accused on the basis of the confession statement that one Subeesh had transferred a sum of Rs.50,000/- to his account through the account of another person in connection with the offence alleged. Though the petitioner moved an application for bail before the Special Court for NDPS Act cases, Manjeri, the same was rejected. Applications for bail filed before this Court were rejected as per Annexures A2 to A5 orders. He further submits that the investigation is over and charge sheet has been filed.

5.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application for bail mainly contending that 40.5 kgs of ganja was seized from the possession of the 1st accused. The statement of the 1st accused revealed that it was the petitioner who has given the contraband to the 1st accused and it is further revealed that on verification of the call records, it is found that the petitioner had constant contact with the 1st accused and by verifying the tower location, both of them were found nearby the building in which the contraband was kept. It is also submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that an amount of Rs.49,000/- was transferred by the 1st accused to the account of the petitioner and the same was revealed on verification of the bank account details. It is also submitted by the Public Prosecutor that towards commission, Rs.50,000/- was also transferred to the account of the petitioner through the account of one Subeesh and based on this, learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioner had an active role in the commission of alleged offence. Learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions further submitted that the petitioner is involved in various other criminal cases of Tirur Police Station, ie., Crime Nos.349 of 2018, 334 of 2018, 351 of 2018, 1327 of 2021, 42 of 2020 and 961 of 2020 and also in an NDPS crime No.12 of 2021 of Kuttippuram Excise Range Office.

Considering the fact that the quantity of contraband involved is huge and that the petitioner is involved in other crimes including one under the NDPS Act, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The bail application is accordingly dismissed.