High CourtsSingle Bench

Khim Singh and Others vs State of Uttaranchal

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 31 July 2001 · Citation: (2001) 2 UC 458

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.C.Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302, 34
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Bail Application No. 626 of 2001

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 181 words

P.C. Verma, J.—Heard the Learned Counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.M.

2.

The applicants are facing prosecution for an offence u/s 302/34 of the I.P.C. According to the applicants, they have been falsely implicated, as it that shown in the FI.R. no occurrence took place which is evident from the post mortem report. The post mortem report shows that rigor mortis passed over from all the four limbs and is found only on the neck. According to mod, this could be only after two to three days, in temperate regions. In view of the post mortem report, the death could have occurred much more before the occurrence. However, it is a matter to be seen in the trial.

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the applicants Khim Singh, Tara Singh and Ranjeet Singh be released on bail in Case Crime No. 1 of 2001 u/s 302/34 I.P. C, Patwari circle Dhaungarh, Distt, Almora on furnishing by each of them a personal bond with adequate sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J. M. Almora.