High CourtsSingle Bench

Kiledarsingh vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 15 November 2022 · Citation: (2022) 11 MP CK 0052

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 148, 149, 294, 302, 307 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25, 27
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 53984 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 447 words

Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J

Case diary is available.

This third application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for grant of bail. The second application was dismissed as withdrawn by order dated 04.02.2019 passed in M.Cr.C. No.3312/2019.

The applicant has been arrested on 07/06/2017 in connection with Crime No.88/2015 registered at Police Station Noorabad, District Morena for offence under Sections 302, 307, 294, 147, 148, 149 of IPC and under Section 25/27 of the Arms Act.

This third application has been filed mainly on the ground that the co-accused Veerendra Singh Gurjar has been granted bail by order dated 30/09/2022 passed in SLP (Crl) No.6939/2022 and co-accused Mehtab Singh Gurjar has been granted bail by order dated 01/11/2022 passed in MCRC No.52347/2022.

It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that according to the prosecution case, the applicant had fired gunshot causing injury on abdomen of Vinod, whereas the gunshot fired by co-accused Veerendra Singh Gurjar had resulted in death of Bhura. Thus, the case of the applicant is on a better footing than that of co-accused Veerendra. It is further submitted that the applicant is in jail from 07.06.2017 and still the trial has not reached to its logical end.

Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the counsel for the State. However, counsel for State could not point out any distinguishable feature.

Considering the fact that the co-accused Veerendra Singh Gujrar has been granted bail by the Supreme Court by order dated 30/09/2022 passed in SLP (Crl) No.6939/2022 and the allegation against the applicant is that gunshot fired by him had caused injury to Vinod and no distinguishable feature could be pointed out by the counsel for the State and without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lac) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.

It is further directed that the applicant shall appear before the S.H.O. Police Station Noorabad, District Morena on 1st of every month during the pendency of the Trial. In case of bail jump or non-appearance of the applicant before the police station as directed by this Court, this order shall lose its effect.

In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on 18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.

Certified copy as per rules.