High CourtsDivision Bench

Kinoo Ram Dass and Another vs Shibendra Narain Chowdhuri

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 19 January 1886 · Citation: (1885) ILR (Cal) 605

HON’BLE JUDGES
McDonell, J · Beverley, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 121 words

McDonell and Beverley, JJ.—A preliminary objection was taken to the hearing of this appeal on the ground that it should not have been re-admitted u/s 558. It is contended that as the pleader in this case was present, though not prepared to go on with it, the appeal was not dismissed u/s 556; and therefore it could not be re-admitted u/s 558. A similar case is that of Buldeo Misser v. Ahmed Hossein 15 W.R. 143 in which we find that under similar circumstances the appeal was held to have been dismissed for default. And followirig that ruling, we think this case was properly re-admitted u/s 558.

2.

The appeal was dismissed on the facts which are immaterial to this report.