High CourtsSingle Bench

Kiran Devi and Others vs Ambika Parsad and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 20 March 2015 · Citation: (2015) 178 PLR 826

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shekher Dhawan, J
RESULT
Partly Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal from Order No. 476 of 2005
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 431 words

Dr. Shekher Dhawan, J—Present appeal is challenge to the award dated 27.11.2004, whereby, the Tribunal i.e. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Faridabad awarded compensation of Rs. 2,72,000/- on account of death of Bijender alias Guddu Pandey who died in motor vehicular accident which took place on 02.09.2003. Claimants have prayed that they have not been awarded just compensation as the income of the deceased has been taken on the lower side and multiplier has also not been applied correctly as per law. ''The Tribunal'' has also not awarded adequate amount on account of loss of consortium though one of the claimants is widow of the deceased and his children. No amount has been awarded on account of transportation and funeral expenses. Learned Counsel for the respondent took the plea that just compensation has already been awarded by ''The Tribunal'' and the present appeal deserves dismissal.

2.

Taking the case from the admitted facts and there being no dispute that Bijender alias Guddu Pandey died as a result of motor vehicular accident leaving behind appellants as LRS. He was of the age of 28 years. The Tribunal has rightly taken the income of the deceased to be Rs. 2,100/- keeping in view the price index as was prevalent in 2003 and on the basis of that after deducting 1/3rd on account of self dependency, the actual loss of income to the claimants comes to Rs. 16,800/- (1400 x 12). However, the multiplier has not been correctly applied by The Tribunal and the same is to be taken to be 17 as per law laid down by the Hon''ble Apex Court in Smt. Sarla Verma and Others Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another, (2009) ACJ 1298 : AIR 2009 SC 3104 : (2009) CLT 1055 : (2009) 6 JT 495 : (2009) 6 SCALE 129 : (2009) 6 SCC 121 : (2009) 5 SCR 1098 : (2009) 5 UJ 2280 : (2009) AIRSCW 4992 : (2009) 3 Supreme 487 and the amount of compensation comes to Rs. 2,85,600/-. Claimants have not been adequately compensated on account of loss of consortium though one of the claimant is widow of the deceased. The same assessed to be Rs. 50,000/- as the accident took place in 2003. Funeral expenses and Transport Expenses assessed to be Rs. 15,000/- and the total amount comes to Rs. 3,50,600/-. Accordingly, the present appeal is partly accepted and amount of compensation enhanced to Rs. 3,50,600/- (2,85,000/- 50,000/- + 15,000/-) in lieu of Rs. 2,72,000/- awarded by the Tribunal. The remaining conditions regarding rate of interest, disbursal of the amount shall remain unaltered.