High CourtsSingle Bench

Kirandeep Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 2 December 2019 · Citation: (2019) 12 P&H CK 0043

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suvir Sehgal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 28182 Of 2019

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 158 words
1.

Reply on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 has been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record. A copy thereof, has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. In para 10 of the reply, it has been submitted that respondent No. 5, who has been appointed as an Administrator, had executed about 90% specific development works in the village.

2.

Vide impugned order dated 13.09.2019, the District Development and Panchayat Officer, Faridkot had appointed Sh. Shavinderpal Singh, Village Development Organizer as an Administrator under Section 200(1) of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 for the limited purpose of usage/utility of the funds in Gram Panchayat, Kothe Malooka Patti from 13.09.2019 to 14.11.2019 i.e. for a period of two months.

3.

The period for which the Administrator has been appointed has already come to an end. By afflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

4.

Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.