AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
9 paragraphs · 388 wordsP.N. Mookerji, A.C.J.
This appeal is by the tenant and it arises out of a suit for ejectment. The suit has been decreed by the learned trial Judge after striking out the tenant''s defence u/s 17(3) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956.
It appears, however, that the instant case is one which will be governed by the old Section 17(2), i.e. before its amendment in 1959.
Under the law, as it then stood, as interpreted by this Court in Biswanath Roy v. Annapurna Roy (1960) 65 C.W.N. 149, it was the duty of the Court under the said Section 17(2) to determine the amount payable by the tenant-Defendant u/s 17(1) and fix a reasonable time for its deposit under the said section (Section 17(2)) before proceeding to take up the matter u/s 17(3) of the above Act; In the instant case, there is no question that such a dispute was raised in the Defendant''s written statement before the application u/s 17(3) actually came to be considered by the Court below. The Court below, however, did not consider the matter u/s 17(2) of the above Act and did not pass any order thereunder. In that situation, its order, striking out the defence u/s 17(3) of the above Act, was illegal and without jurisdiction vide Biswanath Roy v. Annapurna Roy (1960) 65 C.W.N. 149 and accordingly, the said order cannot stand and it must be set aside with the result that the decree for ejectment, following upon the same, would also fall to the ground.
In the above view, we would allow this appeal, set aside the decree of the learned trial Judge and send the matter back to him for reconsidering the same u/s 17(2) of the above Act and for passing appropriate orders thereunder and thereafter, for taking up the matter u/s 17(3) of the above Act and deciding the same in accordance with law and finally disposing of the suit for giving effect to the legal rights of the parties in the light of its aforesaid decision.
There will be no order for costs in this Court.
Let the records go down to the Court below as quickly as possible and let further hearing of the suit be expedited as much as possible.
Amiya K. Mookerji, J.
I agree.