High CourtsSingle Bench

Kishan @ Durgesh Sharma vs State Of M.P. And Another

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 10 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 MP CK 0076

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.S. Ahluwalia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294, 308, 323, 336 · Scheduled Castes And Scheduled Tribes (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(1)(R), 3(1)(S), 3(2)(va), 14A(2), 15A
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No.851 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 187 words

G.S. Ahluwalia, J

It is submitted by the Counsel for the State that the complainant has been informed about the pendency of this appeal, as required under Section 15-A

of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

This appeal has been filed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 being aggrieved

by the order dated 21/9/2020 passed by Special Judge (Atrocities), Morena rejecting the anticipatory bail application.

The appellant apprehends his arrest in Crime No.375/2020 registered by Police Station City Kotwali, District Morena for offence punishable under

Sections 323, 294, 336, 308, 34 of IPC and Sections 3 (1) (R), 3 (2) (va), 3 (1) (S) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act.

The first Criminal Appeal under Section 14-A of the Act which was in the nature of anticipatory bail application was withdrawn by order dated

9/10/2020 passed in Criminal Appeal No.5064/2020 after arguing the matter at length. As no change in circumstance could be pointed out by the

counsel for the appellant, accordingly, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed.