High CourtsSingle Bench

Kishan Lal @ Kishan Das vs State And Ors

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 20 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 RAJ CK 0166

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138, 147
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 31 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 349 words

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

It is stated at the Bar that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties after the judgment dated 12.09.2019 passed by the appellate court

whereby the judgment dated 18.05.2018 passed by the trial has been affirmed. It is borne out that the complainant is not inclined to proceed further in

the matter.

Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a decision of Supreme Court in case of Damodar S. Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H [2010(5)

SCC 66].

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, since the parties have settled the dispute and complainant respondent No.2 had accepted

the sum towards full and final settlement of the cheque, on the satisfaction of the complainant and in the light of provisions of Section 147 of NI Act

and in view of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. (supra), the sentence awarded to

the petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act is liable to be set aside. However, since the compromise has been arrived at after rejection of the

appeal preferred by the petitioner, a cost of 15% of the cheque amount deserves to be imposed upon the petitioner in the light of the decision rendered

by the Hon'ble Apex court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu (Supra).

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit 15% of the cheque amount with the State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur within a period of two

weeks from today.

The conviction and sentence of imprisonment awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, vide judgment

dated 18.05.2018 passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No.4, in criminal case No.25/2015 as affirmed by judgment dated

12.09.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.5, Jodhpur in Criminal Appeal No.286/2018, is hereby set aside on the basis of the

aforesaid compromise.

The revision petition is disposed of accordingly. Stay petition also stands disposed of.