High CourtsSingle Bench

Kishan Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 9 May 2018 · Citation: (2018) 05 CHH CK 0081

HON’BLE JUDGES
ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section — Section 34, 115, 115(2), 120B
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
M.Cr.C. No.2590 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 444 words
1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the Applicant who has been

arrested in connection with Crime No.421 of 2017 registered at Police Station Torwa, District Bilaspur for offence punishable under Sections 115,

115(2), 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 10.12.2017, co-accused Lakhan Kashyap, along with a knife which is operated by a button and cash of

Rs.26,560/- in his possession, was caught by the police and interrogated. During the interrogation, he disclosed that he, along with other co-accused

persons, had made a plan to commit murder of one Minakshi, who was girl friend of Ashish Kashyap, uncle of co-accused Lakhan Kashyap. It is

alleged that for committing murder of Minakshi, the present Applicant and other co-accused had taken a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- as advance. During

investigation, one auto has been seized from the present Applicant. It is alleged that the present Applicant and other co-accused were going in the said

auto to commit murder of Minakshi.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has falsely been implicated. According to the prosecution, the main

accused persons are Lakhan Kashyap and Dhanraj Kshani, who had conspired to commit murder of Minakshi. Dhanraj Kshani has already been

granted benefit of regular bail by this Court vide order dated 16.3.2018 passed in M.Cr.C. No.254 of 2018. There is nothing on record to show that the

present Applicant was involved in making plan to commit murder of Minakshi. He has falsely been implicated in the case on the basis of memorandum

statements of other co-accused. Charge-sheet has already been filed. He is in custody since 10.12.2017.

4.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent/State opposes the bail application.

5.

I have heard Learned Counsel appearing for the parties and perused the entire material available with due care.

6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that one of the conspirators/main accused Dhanraj Kshani has been

extended the benefit of bail, also considering the alleged role of the Applicant in the crime in question and that he is in custody since 10.12.2017,

without further commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to release him on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

8.

It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one local solvent surety in the

like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.