AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
22 paragraphs · 444 wordsThis is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the Applicant who has been
arrested in connection with Crime No.421 of 2017 registered at Police Station Torwa, District Bilaspur for offence punishable under Sections 115,
115(2), 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 10.12.2017, co-accused Lakhan Kashyap, along with a knife which is operated by a button and cash of
Rs.26,560/- in his possession, was caught by the police and interrogated. During the interrogation, he disclosed that he, along with other co-accused
persons, had made a plan to commit murder of one Minakshi, who was girl friend of Ashish Kashyap, uncle of co-accused Lakhan Kashyap. It is
alleged that for committing murder of Minakshi, the present Applicant and other co-accused had taken a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- as advance. During
investigation, one auto has been seized from the present Applicant. It is alleged that the present Applicant and other co-accused were going in the said
auto to commit murder of Minakshi.
Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has falsely been implicated. According to the prosecution, the main
accused persons are Lakhan Kashyap and Dhanraj Kshani, who had conspired to commit murder of Minakshi. Dhanraj Kshani has already been
granted benefit of regular bail by this Court vide order dated 16.3.2018 passed in M.Cr.C. No.254 of 2018. There is nothing on record to show that the
present Applicant was involved in making plan to commit murder of Minakshi. He has falsely been implicated in the case on the basis of memorandum
statements of other co-accused. Charge-sheet has already been filed. He is in custody since 10.12.2017.
Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent/State opposes the bail application.
I have heard Learned Counsel appearing for the parties and perused the entire material available with due care.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that one of the conspirators/main accused Dhanraj Kshani has been
extended the benefit of bail, also considering the alleged role of the Applicant in the crime in question and that he is in custody since 10.12.2017,
without further commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to release him on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one local solvent surety in the
like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.
