High CourtsSingle Bench

Kishanlal Sonwani vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 9 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 CHH CK 0144

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 2263 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 336 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

Heard the petitioner and respondent No. 6.

1.

With the consent of the parties matter is heard finally.

2.

The petitioner's suspension from the post of Sarpanch under Section 40 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam 1993 was revoked by the

Additional Collector, Kabirdham by order dated 11.06.2018. On the revision preferred by respondent No. 6, the Additional Commissioner, without

hearing the petitioner, stayed the effect and operation of the order dated 11.06.2018 against which this writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that Additional Commissioner has stayed the order of Additional Collector without hearing the

petitioner which has effect of granting final hearing to the respondent No. 6 and, therefore, the order of Additional Commissioner be set aside and

matter be remitted for consideration afresh after hearing the petitioner.

3.

On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No. 6 submits that serious irregularities have been committed by the petitioner and the interim

order was granted in accordance with law.

4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

5.

Since the Collector has set aside the order of suspension and remitted the matter for consideration, the learned Additional Commissioner ought not

to have stayed the order of Collector without hearing the petitioner as it has the effect of reviving the order of suspension against the petitioner,

therefore, it would be expedient to remit the matter to the Additional Commissioner for order on the stay application afresh within a period of two

weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

6.

The application for stay is restored to the file of Additional Commissioner which will be considered and decided the by the said authority in

accordance with law after hearing the affected parties.

7.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

8.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).