High CourtsSingle Bench

Kishansinh Jaysinh Manuji Dodiya vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 15 January 2024 · Citation: (2024) 01 GUJ CK 0078

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. R. Mengdey, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application (For Regular Bail - After Chargesheet) No. 20649 Of 2023

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 697 words

M. R. Mengdey, J

1.

RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2.

The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11216005230613 of 2023 registered with Dahegam Police Station, Gandhinagar.

3.

Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4.

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. He has submitted that the marriage span between the deceased and the present applicant was merely of five months. He has submitted that the record further indicates that there appears to be dispute between the present applicant and the deceased-wife which has resulted into the incident in question. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5.

I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. From the record, it appears that the present applicant and the deceased were married five months prior to the incident. However, there was some dispute between them. The applicant was engaged in an agricultural activity, which was no liked by the deceased, and therefore, she had left her matrimonial home and gone to her parental home. The deceased wanted that the applicant to do some job for which the applicant was not ready. The record further indicates that the deceased was suffering from some depression.

6.

This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012]1 SCC 40.

7.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8.

Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11216005230613 of 2023 registered with Dahegam Police Station, Gandhinagar, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

9.

The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

10.

Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

11.

At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

12.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.