High CourtsSingle Bench

Kishor Prasad vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 18 September 2023 · Citation: (2023) 09 JH CK 0042

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rule, 2004 — Rule 54 · Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention Of Illegal. Mining, Transportation And Storage) Rules, 2017 — Rule 13 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 379, 411 · Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 — Section 21 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
CASE NUMBER
A.B.A. No. 7040 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 369 words

Anil Kumar Choudhary, J

Heard the parties.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Palkot P.S. Case No.30 of 2023 registered under sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 54 of the Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rule, 2004, under Section 13 of the Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rule, 2017 and under Section 21 of the M.M.D.R. Act, 1957.

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of the tractor which was seized by police for transporting illegally excavated sand. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-14 of the instant anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.5,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Gumla, in connection with Palkot P.S. Case No.30 of 2023 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.