High CourtsDivision Bench

Kishori Lal vs State of H.P. and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 26 July 2011 · Citation: (2011) 07 SHI CK 0079

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · Sanjay Karol, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 5550 of 2011
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 230 words

Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

i) That the Petitioner be ordered to be paid the gratuity with interest for daily wager as Beldar for daily waged period w.e.f. 01.01.1982 to 01.01.1994.

2.

According to the Petitioner, the issue regarding entitlement for gratuity is covered by the decision of this Court in State of H.P. v. Lashkri Ram in CWP No. 150 of 2004 and followed in many other cases.

3.

Taught Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The Petitioner submits that he would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. In case the Petitioner is similarly situated, he will not be discriminated and the matter will be duly considered by the first Respondent/competent authority in the light of the judgment, referred to above, and appropriate action in accordance with law, by disbursing the eligible benefits by way of gratuity, will be taken within another three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a copy of this judgment and a copy of the judgment, referred to above by the Petitioner.

4.

With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.