High CourtsSingle Bench

Kitabo and others vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 3 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 P&H CK 0031

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surinder Gupta, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 186, 332, 353, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No.29998 Of 2018 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 209 words

The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.371

dated 19.06.2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 186, 332, 353, 506 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Samalkha, District

Panipat (Haryana).

Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioners have joined the investigation, which is still in progress but their custodial interrogation is not required for

the purpose of further investigation.

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated

18.07.2018 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:-

(i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the

accusation against them so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court;

(iv) that the petitioners will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.