High CourtsSingle Bench(2007) 11 KL CK 0020

Kittumani vs Public Service Commission and Others

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 15 November 2007

HON’BLE JUDGES
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 30784 of 2007

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 290 words

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.—Petitioner applied in terms of Ext.P-2 notification issued by the Kerala Public Service Commission, for selection of Reserve Drivers in the KSRTC, prescribing, among other things, a mandatory requirement of a minimum height of 158 cms. with no exemption even for the SC/ST candidates.

2.

Though the Petitioner succeeded in the written examination, it was found that he had only a height of 156 cms. On a re-measurement based on his appeal, the Petitioner''s height was recorded as 157.6 cms.

3.

Except the assertion that his actual height is 159 cms. and that the measuring equipments were not appropriate, there is no legal basis to dispute the finding in the re-measurement, that his height is 157.6 cms. This is so, particularly when the re-measurement was following the complaint that the original measurement of 156 cms. recorded earlier was erroneous and on such re-measurement, the Petitioner''s height was recorded as only 157.6 cms. There is every reason to assume that the authorities involved in re-measuring the height of the Petitioner on 23-4-2007 would have bestowed great care and added attention in the re-measurement.

4.

Having found no reason to disturb the finding that the Petitioner''s height is only 157.6 cms., the next contention to be considered is whether the height of 157.6 cms. is to be rounded off to 158 cms. There by bringing him within the bench mark fixed in the notification. This is clearly impermissible because the prescription as to height, in Ext. P-2, is of a minimum. The height of a person cannot be rounded off, as may be done for certain other purposes, to achieve the prescribed minimum limit .

For the aforesaid reasons, this writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. No costs.